|
Welcome to the Nineteenth
Century: Venezuelan Elections
by Fernando Calzadilla
Printer-friendly
version 
Social Imaginaries at play
I said that for the August 15, 2004 referendum, Chavez opponents’
biggest fear is abstention, because the opposition does not have
a counter-figure to oppose him. They have no 19th-century caudillo
figure, and people have no confidence in the institutions (political
parties, civil associations). On the other side, Chavez has based
his referendum electoral campaign on "Florentino y El Diablo,"
a poem set to music depicting a Manichaean fight between the forces
of good and evil (a familiar theme, we recall, promoted by President
George W. Bush, who spoke of the “axis of evil” and
the U.S. and its “allies” as the forces of good). Composed
by Alberto Arvelo Torrealba, the popular llanero musical
form is identified by most as the Venezuelan emblematic
music. The popular hero Florentino defeats Satan in a singing duel
by the sheer force of his poetry and wit. The devil challenges him
to no other place than Santa Ines, the place where federalist Ezequiel
Zamora won a battle against centralist forces. But the imaginaries
keep adding up. In the last verse, Florentino invokes the virgin
for his protection:
“Sácame de aquí con Dios
Virgen de la Soledá,
Virgen del Carmen bendita,
sagrada Virgen del Real,
tierna Virgen del Socorro,
dulce Virgen de la Paz,
Virgen de la Coromoto,
Virgen de Chiquinquirá,
piadosa Virgen del Valle,
santa Virgen del Pilar,
Fiel Madre de los Dolores
dáme el fulgor que tú das,
¡San Miguel! dáme tu escudo,
tu rejón y tu puñal,
Niño de Atocha bendito,
Santísima Trinidá.
Chavez
opponents have used the virgin as a counter-icon to his association
with Jesus. The virgin and the nation have had an enduring metonymy
through the nation’s representation in a female body and through
Venezuela’s patroness, la Virgen de Coromoto. Florentino’s
invocation dismantles the use of the virgin as an oppositional figure.
The holy trinity (“Santísima Trinidá”)
is also an association Chavez supporters have made using Jesus,
Chavez, and Bolivar. During his acceptance speech for the referendum
in front of the presidential palace (Miraflores), the backdrop framing
Chavez's discourse was the close-up of a hand holding the constitution
and a crucifix. He wore a black suit, white shirt without a tie,
an obvious resemblance to a pastor’s costume. His performance
was emotional, contrived, solemn. He rose to the occasion and played
to his supporters an act of faith. God is on my side.
By
invoking Florentino, Chavez is bringing all these imaginaries into
play and more. The “Battle of Santa Ines” is the name
given by the chavismo to the August 15 referendum. Florentino
represents the good singer, the poet, and the llanero who
defeats the devil using his wit, not force. The virgin is on Florentino’s
side. But in addition to that, as the campaign poster illustrates,
the revolutionary Che is transformed into a Jesus-like figure while
Chavez in fatigues and red beret holds a sword, the symbol of Bolivar
and Zamora’s fight. Thus, Chavez is the embodiment of the
holy trinity representing the revolutionary/Jesus, the independence
hero, and Florentino. The main devil opposing good Chavez is a mixture
of Hitler and Bush (David and Goliath scenario at play) while the
devil’s acolytes in flames represent Venezuela’s private
media owners, business associations and traditional political party
leaders. Even at the strictly rhetorical level, Chavez campaign
uses an action verb in the slogan “No Volverán”
while the opposition uses the abstract “Sí Por
Venezuela.” Religious, cultural, and military social
imaginaries are triggered by Chavez's electoral campaign while his
opponents are left with a Chavez-ousting unique motive that has
no scenario at play other than changing cast without a promise.
|