|
[Page 4: Dysfunctional
Performance: The U.S. Voting Machine Debacle and the Machinery of
Democracy]
Printer-friendly
version 
A Government Performance: The Help America Vote Act
Following his inauguration, in an initial moment of bipartisan
rapprochement, newly named (though arguably not elected) President
George W. Bush pledged to reform the election system to ensure that
nothing like "Florida" ever happened again. And so he
put together a task force to draft election reform legislation.
What resulted was the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), signed
into law by the President in October of 2002.
In the wake of hanging chads and butterfly ballots, HAVA envisioned
the panacea of new high-tech electronic voting machines. These machines,
purchased by individual voting districts with matching funds from
the government, would replace the rusty old mechanical machines
blamed for "Florida," and would promise fair and secure
elections. HAVA mandated legislation for how those districts that
accepted federal monies would operate. (This kind of contingency
funding is a common way for the U.S. government to get around the
Tenth Amendment and impose federal standards.)
HAVA outlines a number of clearly needed election reforms for voter
identification, for access to polling stations and machines (including
access for people with disabilities), and it states how tally and
audit systems must function for paper and optical scan ballots to
be secure and accountable in the case of a voter recount. HAVA also
says that electronic voting machines must have verifiable paper
audit trails, a measure that election reform advocates have universally
called for. However, significantly, HAVA does not mandate paper
back-up systems for electronic voting machines until 2006. According
to HAVA, electronic voting machines purchased prior to 2006 can
rely on electronic back-up systems for the 2004 election. Another
thing HAVA requires, in the name of standardization, is that all
states have computer-generated voter lists like the ones used in
Florida to identify (read: purge) ex-felons from the rolls; it does
not, however, specify guidelines as to how these rolls are to be
generated, and unlike the audit provision, this provision
must be in place by the 2004 election (12).
HAVA is a big reason why we are in the mess we are in today.
|